Mostly interesting but some of the readings were very long, waffly and tedious. Week 4 was quite boring. It didn't really say anything useful. Just a framework and vocabulary for thinking about employee evaluation and development.

For a person approaching this from a political science perspective, this course did provides some interesting insights into how management theory works, though there were shortcoming in the vagueness of Managing Conflict at Work.

The concepts are good but the presentation is average. I personally enjoyed only the leadership, decision theory and performance management sections. The questionnaires for other sections are very poorly crafted.

I was hoping this would be something that I could apply immediately but for me it was a bit more theoretical and not practical. I found it interesting but not something I can apply immediately at work.

There were links that were recommended reading material, especially ones that pointed to a CIPD site. None of them opened. and despite raising it in forum, there was no response from instructors.

A number of grammatical errors and contradictions in source materials. Additionally a number of source materials are no longer available. Overall however, it is a good overview course.

Some assessment questions and answers (particularly in week 6 - conflict) were grammatically nonsensical which made understanding the options quite difficult.

It would have been helpful if all the lecturers had visual aids. I would prefer to see the visual aids rather than watch a lecturer deliver their lectures.

It would be good to consider few more topics related to Managing People, like

1) Collaboration

2) Team Building

3) Employee Encouragement or Ways to train

The Course was fine. I would have rated it better if there were more practical examples, advice and real-life situations rather than so much theory.

The Lesseons was great, but it wasn’t accurate and some very slow, non-aggregating cases and some week 5 links were out of date

Useful content but a very boring teaching style... Needs a better rhythm and more dynamic exercises to practice what you learn.

I was disappointed with the level of grammar and sentence construction in the quiz and assignment sections.

A handful of useful information, however all of them were lectured in superficial manner.

some charts on the presentation would be a good reinforcement to the course information.

Not a particular engaging course, and not helped by typos in notes.

Informative.

Did only the quizes and still passed the course - not a very high level

Not as good, engaging, or thorough as University of Michigan's.

Plenty of great information that will help in the work area.

навыки структурирования процесса управления командой

went over a lot of stuff that is common knowledge

very engaging course. I learned a lot.

صعبة جدا لمن لم يتقن اللغة الانجليزية

A bit too uninteresting and too basic

Me hizo falta mas herramientas